Yiff Panic? Judgement in a Connecticut town shows it’s still not safe to be openly furry.
by Patch O'Furr
We’re through being cool
We’re through being cool
Eliminate the ninnies and the twits
Going to bang some heads
Going to beat some butts
Time to show those evil spuds what’s what
If you live in a small town
You might meet a dozen or two
Young alien types who step out
And dare to declare
We’re through being cool
In three stories I’m sharing today, look for small-town closed-mindedness. It’s a force that propels many furries. If you’re young, have a big imagination and live in a place that can’t contain it, what do you do? Make friends out there in the furry world. That was me in the mid-to-late 90’s (Woof! It sure wasn’t a phase), so there’s no lack of personal experience for the connections I’m making.
These stories happened in smallish cities near New England: West Windsor NJ (population 27,000), Burlington VT (population 42,000), and – in this week’s news – New Milford CT (population 28,000). They show a bit of honest-to-dog political fursecution.
OK, they aren’t black and white. They have debatable issues about behavior like 1) throwing an overstuffed party, 2) regulating hate groups, or 3) representing political constituents with an acceptable image. But then there’s freedom to have fun and hobbies (or even express private, consenting kinks), instead of being forced into a closet made of overbearing judgement. Who was really harmed in these stories – judgers, or furries themselves?
While you read, stay positive. New Milford is the closest location to the new Tiny Paws con, this weekend. They can’t hold furries down!
1) The NJ FurBQ hoax of 2012. Media: NJ.com – Communitynews.org – Fox 5 News video – Dogpatch Press
The town council of West Windsor wanted to shut down volunteer emergency services based at a community center. Meanwhile, the community center was being used by the community; one of the volunteers organized a popular furry party there. It had fun and fursuiting, DJ’s and almost 200 adults enjoying beer and being boisterous (shock, horror.) What happened next resembled Mayberry in the 1950’s, if you switched Red Scare with Yiff Panic. A town council member claimed to have photos of fursuiters humping on a car. News media piled on with their best stab at smearing adults for legal drinking and saying a swear word or two. The scapegoat was set up, and the council knocked it down with a vote to remove the community center funding and emergency service with it.
It was a perfect hit, except… the photos didn’t exist, and the council member hadn’t been there. The details only came out after online confusion where many furries bought the “fursuit sex” story, and rushed to blame each other for bad behavior that never happened.
Although the party was on Memorial Day in May, suspiciously, the news was released to exactly coincide with the spike of Anthrocon promotion in July. The volunteer service and $45,000 of funding were replaced with six figures worth of paid service (hmm, I wonder what crony got paid?) There was also an election for a mayor (who just finished his fifth and final term in 2017). Furries were used as a big fluffy doormat for political gain.
2) Vermont fursuiters fight prejudice in 2015. Media: SevendaysVT.com / update – VPR.net – Dogpatch Press / update
Burlington had a public Mardi Gras event attended by costumers including the Vermont Furs. They were active organizers of charity events and had recently been invited to liven up an official Christmas tree lighting in a nearby town. But an official told them that fursuiting wasn’t allowed in the town commons. Others wore masks for the event, so why stop fursuiters? They were told it was “just different”. A 1960’s-era law intended to stop masked KKK activity was cited. The furries applied for an entertainer’s permit (for buskers who made money) but the city gave them a paperwork runaround.
As a common theme in these stories, this one also hinted about sensational furry fear. The town mentioned a Times Square incident where a “bootleg Elmo” mascot hassled someone. I commented that it was hundreds of miles away and involved panhandling for money, not fursuiting. And comments on my article reached for stereotype about a “babyfur” with no evidence. No harm mentioned, just labels. Again furries were bashing each other.
Eventually, the ACLU stepped in and backed the Vermont Furries. They tied the issue to political protests attended by masked Anonymous protesters. Furries went in front of the town council and got the law amended to only apply to masked crime. This time, being engaged with the lawmakers gained a positive resolution through nonjudgemental listening to others.
3) Connecticut councilman forced to resign by unwilling exposure of furry hobby. Media: Newstimes.com – NY Post
New Milford residents were upset to see Rick Agee‘s post on the town’s Facebook group. It smeared a Democrat town councilman elected in 2015. In the google cache and a screenshot, it got 68 comments and was a gallery revealing a private Sofurry profile that’s now gone.
I compared public accounts of this fellow furry. Their written profile portrays a nice older married person who is creative and seems to care about others. But these were used against him:
- There was weak separation of life and hobby. Their twitter has pics of their political role mixed with their fursuit by Sarahcat. He might as well have doxed himself. Not that you should have to worry if you’re a good person; but sadly others took the choice away.
- The closed SoFurry profile shows F-List-like topics. The info suggests this was written fiction and RP – for reading or writing with consenting adults – but no implication of practicing stuff that shouldn’t be. Furries are typically gentle and tolerant about such expression, but it’s liable to shock a small-town Facebook audience when it’s yanked out of private context.
- FA has yiff art from a comic. It’s labeled a soap opera, and does looks like very emotionally-focused narrative, something furries excel at – using cartoons to depict more humanity than ‘regular’ porn. It’s a shame that outsiders don’t understand how that’s positive, but they didn’t and it wasn’t hidden.
Here’s what followed the unwilling exposure:
On Thursday night, as town Democrats held a previously scheduled opening ceremony of party headquarters on Bank Street, a small group of protesters gathered outside. Among them was Rick Agee, the resident who had made the original Facebook post. He carried a sign saying, “No perverts running our town!” – ”I have kids and grandkids in this town, and I don’t want him representing us,” Agee said.
@kt_domino noticed: “Rick Agee uses his company’s twitter to support the GOP.”
Wait, how did barging onto someone else’s private page involve kids? Was there a reason someone HAD to? That’s the entire issue from this side; why don’t people just ask, or talk and listen about this stuff if it’s necessary? Wouldn’t society be better with appreciation of healthy sexuality in all it’s permutations (even harmless “age play”, to some extent)? Well, that isn’t the world we live in. Understanding gets stomped by judgement and power. There’s more in a followup post on the town page that’s still live. Facebook reaction post – Mayor’s post. It ties to an upcoming reelection campaign.
Politics is ugly. Anyone in it has to lock down their private life extra hard. Anything will be used against them.
— Wuff-in-Disguise Ren (@RenDireWolf) September 8, 2017
This guy didn’t hurt anyone for real. The concerns these people are giving go far beyond the mayor’s careful wording about “higher standard”; they are trashing him for things that most fellow furries know he probably isn’t doing – in the balance of things, fears should be outweighed by knowing that expressing kink is mentally healthy and it’s his private business.
But mistakes were made. Not every place can be like it is near my den in San Francisco. The world crushes idealism, but it grows in the furry community anyways. Wherever you are, try to support each other, don’t fall for fearmongering, and stay safe and happy, furry friends.
Let me give the last word to the former councilman, as he wrote in 2014: “Our most enduring value as furs is the right to be who and what we want.”
UPDATE:
1. I HAVE MET THIS MAN.
— Boozy Badger (@BoozyBadger) September 8, 2017
2. HE IS AMAZINGLY GENEROUS TO CHARITIES.
3. THESE PEOPLE ARE MORONS. https://t.co/EmilAcSa3X
Perhaps he should take up residence in Pittsburgh.
— Uncle Kage (@Unclekage) September 8, 2017
This article characterizes furry as just an animal costume fetish, but parts of this story make no sense unless you know about furry fiction
— Boxer Bunny (@BoxerBunny_) September 8, 2017
It's not sensible... There is a line between fantasy and reality. Rape in fantasy is not a crime and not comparable to the real thing.
— Just Khaz (@KhazWolf) September 8, 2017
This is NOT OKAY. It's sad this is what America has come to. Getting shamed for being unique. This is why I hate incompetent human beings!
— 🐾Sheptember Link!🐾 (@LinkThePup) September 9, 2017
Like the article? It takes a lot of effort to share these. Please consider supporting Dogpatch Press on Patreon, where you can access exclusive stuff for just $1.
Whether it’s on bumper stickers or F-list, I’ll never understand this (particularly, peculiarly)American compulsion to detail one’s every socio-political-sexual preference.
Given F-List was a place for roleplay you are advertising to let people know what you are interested in before engaging people.
This is not the same thing as a bumper sticker.
Except if it’s public, it pretty much IS. And f-list is as public as any website since you can search it without being logged in. We really need to stop acting like just because most people aren’t furries that what we post on a public website won’t be seen. The public has every right to go to Flist and search whomever.
I don’t think he’s comparing how accessible something is, but the functions. A bumper sticker is to F-List as a street billboard is to a Craigslist personal ad, and:
1) while a bumper sticker is literally public, F-list is only public in the sense that someone can find it if they search for it. But this case wasn’t even F-List, it was on SoFurry, and someone had to create an account to get in and see his. 2) The preferences were essentially search check boxes to filter how things displayed, and due to confusing UI design, he thought they weren’t visible at all. https://www.flayrah.com/7083/furry-chairman-new-milford-ct-resigns-due-sofurry-profile-mishap-how-site-design-flaws-are
I can’t say the former councilman didn’t make mistakes by mixing his activities, but I can definitely blame the guy who smeared him for crossing a line of privacy by pursuing him on Sofurry.
If by chance you did end up viewing the NYPost article, you can clear the cookie they likely tacked onto your browser to deprive them of any marketing info they can glean from you. If you’re on Chrome, it’s under Settings > Privacy and Security > Advanced > Content Settings > Cookies > Search at the bottom.
It’s not much, but it’s a good way to give ’em a nice, big, fuzzy ‘fuck you’.
I don’t usually have a problem with tracking like this; makes it a little easier to find things I care about so I don’t mind them making money off me. But these people…just no. Clickbait ‘journalism’ like this needs to go the way of the dodo.
Swing to the opposite end of the spectrum, and you have excellent folks like Patch here. Thank you.
Anywho, I hope Gray can find a different way to engage with politics or at least an enjoyable alternative career. At the very least, he’s got a free beer from me at his next con for all this trouble.
Simply disgusting! In reference to the fact that a man could not do his job due to a bunch of caveman freaking out over some info in an art site profile. Politicians like those who got him resigned cannot separate fantasy from reality, yet they expect us to trust them in leading the world we live in or to respect the laws that they vote? This is a fine example of why humanity is a failure, why I have zero trust in the judgment of any person I don’t know, and why I passionately despise humanity as a collective group. As for this councilman, I hope he can become a politician in some other more civilized area… the fandom lacks people in those places.
Yeah, that’s a problem, but why does the title have “yiff” in the name? Sexual acts were never mentioned in the article…?
Story 1) “A town council member claimed to have photos of fursuiters humping on a car.” (He didn’t).
Story 2) Why are mardi gras masks OK but fursuits not? The officials: “It’s just different” — I think we know why.
Story 3) Gray Muzzle was smeared with exposure of his SoFurry profile because it had a setting to allow personal viewing of fictional sex content.